Decision in process after minor revision. Editors are often busy.

Decision in process after minor revision Sep 14, 2021 · Typically, a reviewer’s decision falls in four categories: acceptance without revision, acceptance after minor revision, acceptance after major revision, and rejection. When a paper receives a minor revision decision, it might not be sent for a second round of peer review; usually, the editor goes through the revisions and gives a final approval. some journals can move the status when one review has been submitted, while others might ask for 2 or 3 or more. Based on this, it may take about two-three weeks for this round of review and for the final decision. This is the second round of revisions; two months ago, we received a “major revisions” decision with many detailed comments from the reviewers. The Editors have begun a decision in the system. However, it is good to remember that an ‘accept with minor revisions’ decision does not guarantee acceptance. Decision in Process. IOP has a range of different decisions you could receive and these are outlined below. Acceptance decisions on manuscripts can be made by the academic editor after peer review once a minimum of two review reports have been received. If the previous editorial decision was B (minor revisions), only the editor will see the author responses and will make a decision based on them. received a Minor Revision or a Major Revision decision and will undergo further consideration after reviewer- and editor-requested changes have been made by the authors, and received a Reject and Resubmit decision, meaning that the work requires major structural work beyond normal revisions so that the resubmission will be essentially a new The time to render a first decision averages about 43 days, but times vary depending on how long it takes for the editor to receive and assess reviews. Also, the second round took 8 months. The comments were entirely new. If the editor made a decision, it should be 'decision in progress'. This change has occurred Dec 15, 2001 · 수정 후 게재(accept with minor revision)인 경우, 본문의 사소한 내용을 고친 뒤 별도의 심사 없이 논문이 게재된다. After getting the minor revision letter, I immediately completed the revision in accordance with the feedback from the reviewers (the suggested changes just involve adding a few sentences) and immediately resubmitted the revision to ScholarOne. Dec 22, 2015 · The letter shows that the reviewers "have asked for some other minor revisions". The pause in time does not always mean a rejection in underway. 5 months since the first submission, I got a major revision but it made me happy as all the comments were positive mainly on the restructuring of some words, adding references, etc. The statement was: ‘Your paper was found acceptable pending revision. The following decision types are available: Reject; Major revision; Minor revision Dec 24, 2020 · For now, you may also refer to this related query: How long should I wait for the status "Decision in process" after minor revision? Then, as next steps, you could prepare for the proofing stage by going through these resources: The Journal response: Major revision -> minor revision "Revise for Editor Only'' -> reject. The status consequently changed and was "Decision in process" for 3 days, when right after it changed to "With editor". Provisional accept Following peer review, […] It says “minor revisions”, but doesn’t explicitly say “accepted with minor revisions. After getting a moderate revision for the manuscript and resubmitting it, it is possible to get moderate revision again, or minor revision, or accept directly without any further edits. Editor Decision. Actually I am not referring to the peer review process, it usually takes time, in fact, some editors after receiving the reviw reports do invite for more opinion different from the initial It is very possible to get a minor revision as a first decision, and then major revision as second decision, and finally a rejection. It has been 3 weeks that the paper status stuck at decision in process. Oct 1, 2024 · If you have submitted your manuscript to an Editorial Manager journal but you have not yet received a final decision, you can check its status online. I had a manuscript that was rejected after "minor revision. ” The reviewers left only one comment, and the editor said that the work was well received. 수정 후 재심(accept with major revision)인 경우, 편집자/심사자의 의견에 따라 대규모의 내용 수정이 불가피하며 추가 심사를 받아야만 한다. Jan 8, 2021 · How long should I wait for the status "Decision in process" after minor revision? What does 'Awaiting Approval/Editing Checklist' mean after submitting my paper for minor revisions? Hope that helps. Apr 28, 2019 · After major revision, two reviewers gave me minor revision (only change one word) and the editor was pleased to consider publication. For papers accepted after minor revision, the revised papers are often published without another full process of peer review. The status (as usual) changed directly to "With editor" on the system and after 3 days, I received a notification After your article has been reviewed, you will receive an email with a first decision on the article. You will see what each decision type is and what it means for you and your article. After re-submission, the status changed from "under review" to "decision in process". Dec 15, 2019 · For a minor revision, the editor may decide to send the revised manuscript to the peer reviewer for a final check or review the manuscript themselves if the changes were indeed minor. Mar 15, 2016 · The exact semantics of this vary depending on the journal, but as a rough guide, the resubmitted manuscript for a “major revision” decision will be returned to the same reviewers for their opinion on the new version; a minor revision will be scrutinized by the AE; and an accept will move straight into the publication queue. " What was odd was that the two reviewers for the second round did not talk about my revision at all, but treated the manuscript as a new submission. My last submission date after minor revision was Jan 17, where a minor revision comments from review was completed on Mar 17. Apr 18, 2021 · Manuscripts move from "Under review" to "Required Reviews Complete" when all the necessary reviews to make a decision have arrived. Since today I am able to see the "Decision in Process" update. The decision may need to be confirmed by multiple Editors in some journals, and the Editors may decide to seek additional reviews or assign another Editor, returning the manuscript to Jul 30, 2021 · Hi! I've got a submission that underwent major and then minor revision and was resubmitted. Editors are often busy. About the editorial process: As there are many steps involved in the editorial process, this may in some cases take longer than you had anticipated. How long this stage normally takes ?. May 8, 2020 · The ‘Decision in Process’ status after the ‘Required Review Completed’ status means that the associate editor (AE), who has been handling your manuscript all this time, has made a decision on your paper based on the peer review comments and your changes, and has now communicated their decision to the Editor-in-Chief (EiC), who will make It should take at least a few weeks for re-review and the editor to make a decision after your revision is submitted (if the previous decision was B (minor revisions), then the timelines may be shorter). Aug 25, 2021 · If the paper is not with reviewers, the status should be 'with editor'. If you Sep 29, 2014 · Instances of this decision are also rather rare. g. This can be heart-breaking to authors. Oct 1, 2024 · When the Editors begin to enter a decision it will move the status to 'Decision in Process'. After 1. Timeline It should take at least a few weeks for re-review and the editor to make a decision after your revision is submitted (if the previous decision was B (minor revisions), then the timelines may Dec 15, 2019 · For a minor revision, the editor may decide to send the revised manuscript to the peer reviewer for a final check or review the manuscript themselves if the changes were indeed minor. The status stayed "with the editor" for around 4 months and suddenly, I get a rejection for my The "decision in process" is the editor choosing if the next step is acceptance, revision, or rejection. Acceptance decisions are made by an academic editor (the Editor-in-Chief, a Guest Editor/Topic Editor/Collection Editor, or another suitable Editorial Board member). This is usually journal-dependent, e. Then I revised and sent it back. I submitted my paper to a Springer journal. After two months, I received minor revision as the decision. However, expect a slightly longer wait at this time of the year due to the approaching holiday season. And I am sure neither of them was the initial reviewer. The editor considers reviewer feedback and their own evaluation of the manuscript in order to reach a decision. Nov 21, 2022 · After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. If you're seeing 'under review', it's because the paper has been sent to reviewers. Nov 21, 2020 · Hello. If it is taking long process of review time (more than 3 weeks) after minor revision then any revised decisions can be Nov 13, 2018 · I would like to ask whether you had a similar experience. It is rare I have submitted a manuscript to a journal on September after few days the status changed to under review and after 5 months the it changed to all required reviews are completed and immediately to decision in process. ’ It is likely possible when paper sent new reviewer than earlier reviewers. dioaph svfy pixc xxbdd fcvcrp wplvmq jwxe rgxxixpl bmyqf acv