Nfs or smb for streaming. Thread starter kpisacic; Start date May 9, 2018 .

Nfs or smb for streaming. I found that without even specifying options for … .

Nfs or smb for streaming Depending on your connection, it can be way faster while using less resources. SMB will definitely serve you better Map an SMB share and an NFS share to the same the dataset. However, today, with technologies like NFS and SMB, file sharing and collaborating with other users and servers have become easy. 3 SMB media streaming problems. On a Windows PC with access to the share, open the start menu and type media In this tutorial, we’ll learn about file-sharing protocols. Infuse includes a built-in speed test feature that allows you to test actual transfer speeds from where your videos are stored. Companies are moving their file-based business applications to the cloud to gain flexibility, scalability, and increased performance. It is the If you are going to read/write from those volumes from more than just Plex, NFS and SMB will probably be faster. Kodi will create a local library directly from the SMB shares. It’s a time capsule, so it’ll back up my Mac too. Not sure what versions of each protocol it was using then Both SMB and NFS are network protocols of the application layer, used mainly for accessing files over the network. Works on all OSes you have. When i switched to SMB and played some files directly (chunksize 1mb) they were working w/o problems. NFS doesn't do encryption without a lot of work, but SMB does with a checkbox (if you're using SMBv3 and have clients that support it). if you submit a bug report, plese if possible submit with And for random write, NFS is slightly better than SMB when using plain text and encryption. I worked with it a few years ago at a different job. * Windows is not a great NFS server, so if your storage box is Windows, stick with SMB. So i reset the emby-kodi-addon and instead of going with "native path option" i chose "addon default". I would set up NFS on your WHS nfs: I need a good guide on "make it be encrypted / authenticated". Every time I've tried Samba over the years, it has worked like once, on a tuesday, if it is not windy. There's also CSI drivers (official ones) for NFS and SMB already. I can then remove SMBv1 from the NAS. This means that each VM you create becomes a Managed Directory on the FlashArray. In my opinion you should use nfs version 3. mefistofelez. Turnkey NFS server won't work for the same reason. FTP can only be used for large files, if you have thousands of files in the shared folder - Our NFS datastore implementation is VM aware. I do this with the Local Path option as I don't host my docker env under TN but a separate dedicated host; that also handles a few other things. xml in the hopes of optimizing buffering behavior, in order to hopefully allow smooth playback of high bitrate HEVC content over SMB v3 (or NFS if needed). Is there any performance improvement/penality going with NFS over SMB? Does NFS on Synology support the recycling bin in case of accidental deletion from the remote device? However, NFS (at least prior to NFSv4) has weaker security than SMB. ZFS has its own file locking, so you should be fine. Also for some reason my videos showed up under the photos folder instead of the videos on (when browsing for the upnp source). Thread starter kpisacic; Start date May 9, 2018 Probably simpler is to use NFS. 3 SMB media streaming problems 6. i prefer NFS and use it Set up a NFS or SMB share on the NAS and configure it as storage in your PVE cluster. Enter settings specific to SMB or NFS protocol (see below). If you are a Windows household, then most likely SMB might be the only one you would ever use. I use MiniDLNA to serve music tracks to my KEF LS50W speakers. Once the remote share is mounted on your linux box I assume you'll "bind mount" this to your Plex docker container volume. My Shield, NFS tends to perform better in Linux-based environments, while native SMB implementation has higher performance in Windows setups. Still not working. With Kodi, the movie can then be played both via NFS and via SMB. Joined 2002. I've enabled all three services and created the shares but I'm unable open them on Kodi to access the media. Of course, both are flexible enough to do either. I have been having issues with NFS and slow read/write speeds in Proxmox from my TrueNAS system. Its strength lies in the ability for many machines to access the Problem is it never mounts after restarting. Since SMB is supported by Windows, many (2024-02-03, 12:16) MrMagic Wrote: (2024-02-03, 01:03) hdmkv Wrote: Never done HTTP streaming. The protocol c NFS has way less overhead than SMB. This migration includes enterprise applications such as As far as performance goes Assuming that your FreeNAS server is properly spec'd you should have no issues using SMB for Plex. In Linux just install the net* packages and then edit the /etc/exports file. iso from a nfs or smb share? Can I use iPXE in some way? edit: I want something that I can remote into after it has booted. I'd either do a bind mount (-v option) or use docker's native NFS mounting via the --mount command this will be entirely dependent on the containers and what you are trying to do, you could make an internal service user in the container, mount with -v your Personally, I would look into NFS. Example: let's say your 40 When sharing files over a network, you have two main protocols to select from NFS and SMB. While NFS is better suited for Linux based environments and SMB on Windows, both protocols can function If you aren't already using RDMA with NFS or SMB Direct, try enabling those. It's like NFS vs SMB. It is widely used in Windows environments to access files over the local area network (LAN). 1 is a Session trunking mechanism (Also known as NFS Multipathing), which provides it with much more fault-tolerant Stream to two destinations and record to USB local storage simultaneously; Stream to two destinations and record to NFS/SMB network storage simultaneously; Having a recorded NFS Clients VLC & KODI on Android TV The NFS is a UNIX protocol for file transfer. turns out on my setup kodi doesn't like streaming from NFS. The following notes are the results of my experimentation in using different methods for restricting access to the shares. , Movies, TV Shows) are shared and accessible I currently use SMB/Samba on my network and it works fine and I have successfully mounted these devices on both windows and linux clients. Based on what I see from two different NAS vendors, it looks like SMB v3 is the best network protocol one can use in terms of overall performance on macOS, with AFP being the second best. Stream dvd folder, DVD ISO, Bluray ISO and BDMV folder only possible on nfs/smb method, in this case default player is used and plex not involved. Kodi can do everything for free, but every client has to be set up manually. M. Probably depends on the client hardware and network. Dlna is screaming fast but does not support moviesheets and folder images ( using tversity). The best way to ensure that the 10Gbit network is used, is to assign IPs in a different subnet on these NICs. Auto-mount is through NFS v4. (It might not work any better than SMB but it is worth a few Best practice is to use the External Storage app and mount a Local Path or existing and already setup External (SMB\NFS). It feels a bit better with SMB. I recommend plain SMB with the default options for LAN I generally think NFS for Linux, CIFS/SMB for Windows. Compatibility makes it possible to The choice between NFS and SMB depends on your network environment and needs. Interestingly streaming from the MacPro to the Intel NUC runs smoothly. High traffic loads can slow down the data transferring procedure. I've tried: 192. What you do gain with NFS is: primitive file access control (via standard Unix file permissions) primitive share access control; user mapping Increasing that from 128 KB to 1 MB seemingly improved SMB v3 performance a bit further, making it surpass NFS (haneWin NFS Server with increased thread count and transfer size) by quite a bit. With VLC it still does not work at all. It is supported by both Linux and Mac clients and gives some access control + have good performance. this seems to be working so far Been playing with the first two and considering the 3rd. Do you think switching to NFS could help? My setup is OMV6 NAS I have multiple datasets that have full permissions when accessing via SMB and read only when accessing via NFS. You get best performance from NFS in most setups and is required when streaming high bit rate 3d content. Just a side note I’m having trouble streaming 4K media locally over SMB without transcoding. I use NFS on my laptops. jhsrennie Team-XBMC Developer. The main benefits of using NFS instead of SMB are its low protocol overhead (which allows it to send data across a network more quickly) and its use of simple UID's to authenticate users rather than username/password combinations. Like you say, file locking can and will cause issues if more than one protocol are given edit rights. SMB has additional protocol overhead than NFSv3; unless you need specific Windows features/attributes, NFS will be simpler. (2023-08-27, 11:32) blunden Wrote: (2023-07-19, 20:36) jbinkley60 Wrote: (2021-12-08, 04:38) blunden Wrote: My setup consists of an Nvidia Shield TV 2015 running Kodi 19. The Linux distros use different package names, so installing "nfs*" works on all. I got tired of having to "fix it", so I switched to NFS (using the freeware WinNFSd) and there have been no more problems, and it uses Media Streaming: Utilise SMB for streaming media files from a Linux-based home server (running Samba) to various devices like smart TVs and game consoles. iso stored on a local nfs or smb. I personally find them very similar. SMB on my nas doesn’t have full features that a windows SMB server would have. Hi So I have a Synology 412+. Does any have/use any of the roku devices? We are moving house end of the month and was thinking instead of recreating DVD films for the kids every over week as they keep stratching the discs, I’m thinking of putting in a media streaming device. Moving NFS and SMB Applications to the Cloud The data says it all. But your problems may be with WHS as it has background processes that can slow down transfers. It's just not a good or reliable idea. cifs executable. Specifically, we’ll cover the differences between the NFS, SMB, and CIFS protocols. efla You can also set up Kodi as an SMB or NFS Client where you stream media from a central location like a NAS, but still, this isn’t the same as the simple server that Jellyfin I saw some workarounds, like using Localcast app to stream files from Kodi, but couldn't get it to work. It is only in the disk image NFS share I am getting these slow speeds. Most of the time when I have trouble with SMB it is a result of lacking permissions, even when it seems like the correct ones are set. Example: let's say your 40 It seams that the X9s has real issues with NFS, which should be faster than SMB with less overhead. When video is played, NAS sends data at only 2-3 MiB/sec. In my environment I need to support NFS clients (NFS is faster – good for streaming) and also SMB clients (Mac & Windows). Posts: 7,256 Joined: Nov 2008 Reputation: 121. In my k8s cluster I use NFS and SMB, nothing else, for my PVs/PVCs. Unlike other well-known file protocols like FTP and HTTP, the NFS, SMB, and CIFS protocols were designed for sharing and accessing files with a seamless experience, as if directories and files were local to our computer. I have always experienced issues with my NAS's when trying to set them up using SMB. This volume is shared via SMB to my clients, and NFS to my Unix-based servers. the difference in NFS/SMB is platform - NFS is linux, SMB is windows but they are mostly functionally equals UPNP/DLNA isn't even in the same category as it's a streaming protocol and the rest are actual filesystem protocols Find. I use SMB. 1. And it has worked every time since then. I also would recommend against blackbox storage systems, go set up a TrueNAS system. À la place, les fournisseurs proposent des services de NFS is nice to have in case you have some kind of application that supports NFS but not SMB, such as ESXi. Plex does have fewer issues streaming when NFS is used according to the Kodi and OSMC teams. I personally use SMB for my Plex Server and can stream multiple fully uncompressed BlueRays (20GB to 30GB) without issue. Infuse runs as an app on the clients, not the NAS. And the Intel NUC can connect with MacOS native SMB without any problems. But even here it still has a few jerks and does not run 100% smoothly. So far I haven't found a single way to run an NFS server in an unprivileged container, Network File System, or NFS, is a way to share folders over a network, and was added to XBMC in v11 (Eden). for all linux, nfs is going to be your better bet. But a co-worker achieved the same thing using SMB. Network File System, or NFS, is a way to share folders over a network, and was added to XBMC in v11 (Eden). You seem to be assuming some sort of exotic HLS "live encoding" scenario. install nfs-kernel-server; create mount points in /etc/exports, make sure proper permissions are given to each mount point; test the mount point at the remote client: showmounts -e [nfs-server-ip-address] install samba; setup the shares in /etc/samba/smb. I connect to the remote server via SFTP as this gave me slightly higher speeds than NFS or SMB. Also, NFS performs better for me because it isn’t a simulated SMB server, it’s native. Windows 10 can now! But even then, SMB (Samba) Or just a real Windows AD server have many more ACL controls, inheritance properties and other lockdown features based on user or group permissions per-directory (or FS) whereas NFS shares only have an /etc/exports entry and optional Samba/SMB support for streaming videos from NAS. But then Windows are for looking out of and a Mac is something you wear in the rain. Using Crystal disk mark, we see the below performance for reads and writes. However, I really wouldn't do the postgres database like this. Also the benchmark you posted omits SMB4, and there is no mention of the SMB3 kernel server. Create NFS or SMB Shares on TrueNAS: If you haven’t already, set up NFS or SMB shares on your TrueNAS system. On small random accesses NFS is the clear winner, even with encryption enabled very good. Differences between NFS and SMB. SMB/CIFS - is the Windows sharing protocol. You only need the mount. Then be able to select different . If, however, you want an easy to set up backend service that can stream/share from your NAS that tracks start/stop positions in all the different clients, I would 100% recommend emby. I can connect do it from my computer and back up whatever I want. I already have an Intel Nuc. NFS and SMB are both tried and tested protocols for data sharing over a network. . Try to turn off demigrator and any other services that are in really needed. Reply reply I'm now trying to share the dataset with Kodi and I've tried SMB, NFS and WebDAV. Both SMB v1 and NFS should be Which should I choose? My transfer speeds are horrendis from my share to my macbook pro but I know I have gigabit and proper wiring going to both. I feel like SMB is the more natural choice for sharing a directory with multiple users, and NFS is the more natural choice with sharing a file system with multiple computers. g. Please correct me if I'm wrong and it is possible to stream whole playlists this way, including party mode; 3. I purchased this current replacement player after November 1, 2016 from Amazon Prime membership. I have installed it on my Linux partitions for streaming videos on my PC to my Android devices, especially to our Android TV. I generally think NFS for Linux, CIFS/SMB for Windows. It was clunky, difficult to use, and even The synology nfs implementation isn’t very good. I can't speak to SMB Direct since I don't use Windows anymore. Like the other user said, you can mount SMB or NFS shares on the device you're running Immich from, and then mount those directories as volumes in your Docker compose file. It is easier to install than SMB and FTP, and its overhead is smaller. 6. NFS shines in Linux-based and low-latency systems, while SMB is ideal for Windows In this blog post, we’ll dive into what NFS vs SMB are, their similarities, and their differences. NFS is even more fast then SMB. However, I am planning to use this drive for some gaming files and potentially network accessible programs and I came across NFS as an alternative that may be faster. Just make sure you are doing somethign to synchronize UIDs across hosts. So it’s better to use SMB, much better security. SMB has safer defaults. But does it stream from a NAS box? I have a Plex is fundamentally DLNA when you break it down. I’d strongly recommend using SMB over AFP wherever possible - anecdotally it’s been much more reliable for me, and as mentioned in the Wikipedia article on AFP it’s been depreciated since Mavericks (10. Network File System Media Streaming: Less suitable: ️ (2024-02-03, 01:03) hdmkv Wrote: Never done HTTP streaming. It’s also not as reliable as dlna. You can use SMB v2 for compatibility or try NFS if it works well for you. The test files are stored on an SSD, simply to rule out performance issues on that end. Unlike other well-known file protocols like FTP and HTTP, the NFS, SMB, and CIFS Kodi is great if you only have one media streaming device. i don't know of any quality, easy to use sub-$100 NFS implementation for Windows. Member. Broad SMB has additional protocol overhead than NFSv3; unless you need specific Windows features/attributes, NFS will be simpler. SMB = Windows Network Shares NFS = Basically the UNIX (think Linux) equivalent of SMB. Security wise, SMB and AFP will be the two most secure. You can snap, clone and monitor at a per-VM level with NFS datastores. Afaik ftp isn't the best protocol for streaming because it is for whole files and im not sure if ftp handels jumping forward and backward in a video verry well. I have not tried to stream from the Intel NUC to the X9S. To get nfs-kernel-server module working you need to either modify apparmor or enable nesting, on privileged containers. I am looking for an option to play files from my network SMB drive on my LG TV with WebOS. selfcontained Senior Member Posts: 192 #3. Press the "OK" button on the screen. Have you tried using NFS. I previously has a Synology NAS which had an NFS share for Kodi and this worked perfectly so I know the networking side isn't an issue. Third-Party Streaming Devices: If your TV still has issues accessing the shared folders directly, you can consider using a third-party streaming device (e. SMB is better for streaming bandwidth i _think_ i got it fixed. SMB is by far the best option for cross-platform. NFS is much more performant, particularly when mounted via fstab. Progressive file streaming is a perfectly valid way of streaming if you're just looking to access a single file without reencoding it and SMB, NFS or even HTTP(S) are all perfectly valid for that use. A friend uses nfs from his nas and it’s as fast as dlna but he’s using folder Windows typically does not have a built-in software which implements the NFS protocol. Streaming worked tho. 11. Old SMB protocols have disclosed security issues, so at one point you may be in the situation that the client may not connect to the NAS unless you lower the security of the client (not a good idea). I still enountered playback problems a few minutes in though. NFS is faster for smaller files, but once you get to bigger files, they're about the same. Demo showing 4 protocols for streaming video (and file transfers), here from Linux PC to Android devices (incl Android TV) on Local Area NetworkWritten compa Kodi would make more sense for your use case (single user streaming from a local network). Before switching, every time Windows updated it would screw up the SMB shares. I've had really good luck with SMB. If I switch the pool over to SMB, will I have the same issue? I want to test it but also things work just fine, its just when starting up a VM, that I get slow startup and such. I would use NFS because all small NAS are Linux based and among the three protocols NFS is more robust than iSCSI and SMB in that context. However, you can introduce a number of issues, if you aren't careful about users. Works great! Let's focus on the Infuse streaming client that lives on my iPhone. I've got my Plex LXC set up in proxmox, but of course there is no media. Some devices support multiple You are getting the benefit of an encrypted data stream so there is a benefit to those CPU cycles. Jellyfin has lots of additional features - I've just migrated to it from using Kodi alone - like easy remote access and Streaming through infuse has been flawless. Also worth mentioning NFS doesn't play nice with Unicode characters, so if you need to display certain languages you won't have a fun time. There are some players that can cast the music. 2. (2024-02-03, 12:16) MrMagic Wrote: (2024-02-03, 01:03) hdmkv Wrote: Never done HTTP streaming. By kupoint December 29, 2022 in General Support. And performance does not, in any way, suffer. It's the "Best app for streaming local media on an apple tv 4k". I've always found NFS to be MUCH faster than SMB - like not even close, so I'm surprised at the posts to the contrary. It’s less effort (for me anyways) to just use NFS for server purposes. I did have some issues when using SMB/NFS, but switching to FTP sharing method seemed to do the trick for me. I could also mount the For NFS and iSCSI testing, i spun up a single VM and placed a disk on each type of Data store. I did a quick test and formatted a movie from x265 to x264. Firstly while streaming something in 4K, check the Network bandwidth and CPU usage unable to output more than 20-30 MB/s or so, because the CPU (some basic ARM) was hitting 100%. Smb allows these but the combination slows the unit down dramatically probably due to loading the images. So I was looking at the Roku stick or roku 1 as they are only £50 ish. --Next test: (2024-02-03, 12:16) MrMagic Wrote: (2024-02-03, 01:03) hdmkv Wrote: Never done HTTP streaming. @Juliean I agree that a multiprotocol NFS/SMB share is likely to cause you problems. 2023-06-30 12:39 am #4 2023-06 Do you need it if you can play your files using NFS/SMB? Not really if all your client devices can connect to your content over NFS or SMB. It has been mainly programmed to use a Windows SMB server, and has very serious buffering issues with NFS or SMB servers outside of windows. * NFS can be tuned to be faster than SMB, but you need to know what you're doing. If rsync is used for file transfer, NFS is always better than SMB using plain text and encryption. Other protocols work fine, I can watch movies with Jellyfin app or with internal player by DLNA. And I think this approach is more suited for streaming single files. 2. If you want to use NFS for accessing files on a Windows PC, you may need to install and configure some thirdparty NFS server software (such as HaneWin NFS Server). Reply. When emplexer play stream over nfs/smb external subtile automatic used, but, subtitle menu is not acessible (in http method too). Usually that's the case Enabling NFS and mapping the drive. I would try to find a way to mount NFS over Android. On a low latency network, is anyone using an S3 compatible interface to transfer files instead of NFS or SAMBA? I wonder how TrueNAS scale fare in If you are Mac household, then all those protocols may or may not be used. 1 and under still can't mount NFS. Enable NFS service on your Synology NAS. The performance of both is pretty similar outside of that. On top of that many dedicated local streamers can also support 3rd party jukeboxes like mymovies, zappiti, along with others. 2011-07-28, 09:53 . Reading transactions are faster in SMB with the 4-MB rate. I ended up using FTP for local streaming as it offers much more throughput. Search for apps that support SMB (Samba) or NFS (Network File System) protocols, as these are commonly used for file sharing. I personally would not use WebDAV. Limited by Design: Designed primarily for streaming media, not for general file access or manipulation. SMB (Server Message Block) is a file-sharing protocol providing access to shared data over the network. However, it can be a real PITA to manage permissions in a multi-user environment. 3 (technically the latest of the stuttering fix builds from here) that attempts to play content from a Windows machine. Older versions, however, can be significantly slower. Before accessing a shared folder with your NFS client, you must change the settings on your Is it better/easier to connect the Linux Clients to the OMV Server via SMB/CIFS or NFS? I need the SMB/CIFS to share OMV files with my Windows PCs. 0). With support for several Open Source hypervisors and virtual environments including OpenStack, Cloudstack, and Citrix, TrueNAS is the ideal platform for open virtualization. We can note that maximal bandwidth Overview. Same video files are player properly locally but with stuttering from NFS. selfcontained Senior Member. Possible with Kodi? If so, how does one set this up? I see this wiki guide, but can a share be added just like with SMB/NFS?Wondering if one also needs to do something on the NAS side to allow this. Again, I've done this too on So the plan is setup a Pi to act as a gateway using SMBv1 to stream to the Sonos speakers, and to mount the music folder from my NAS using SMB/NFS or similar. Reactions: mefistofelez. No lag, stutter, or buffering with any of the 4K rips I’ve thrown at it. Additionally, file permissions might be different between SMB and NFS. conf; setup the access clearance for samba user with smbpasswd; I installed it onto Windows PC, and will stream my media over the LAN from a NAS. TO answer some questions people may think of: I can configure the Sonos S1 to "talk" specifically to the Pi; Sonos S1 doesn't fully support UPNP/DLNA SMB is dogshit at dealing with this kind of workload. I like to think of our NFS datastores NEVER had streaming issues with SMB for any content on previous firmwares , unlike thread creator I've never understood why possibly the majority of people use SMB and not NFS. All of my media is on a TrueNAS box completely separate from my Proxmox I have tested SMB vs NFS on my Vero 4K, and there is a definitive difference between them. Second, if I'm right both NFS & SMB are access protocols and dictate how you access the NAS, the files are stored using ext2/ext3, so what you would be doing is changing how you communicate with the NAS rather than how the data is stored, so no data should be lost. Earlier, file sharing and collaborating with the shared files were often monotonous, time consuming, and expensive. No Plex add-ons or anything like that. I have been using NFS with Kodi for a few years I would never go back to SMB, ever. NFS is suitable for Linux users whereas SMB is suitable for Windows users. Often those jukeboxes can only be used when you have set up direct access with Smb or NFS. Recently I've been tweaking the cache settings in advancedsettings. Since you have NFS working I’d use that, but If you want to use SMB I’d double check permission requirements. Ensure that the media folders (e. Granted my NFS server is a Raspberry Pi and clients are a PC and RPI running Linux. SMB is too Windows-specific and it's absurd to use it on Linux/Unix-kind machines only. To confirm, I tried streaming a video file over SMB now and I have no problem doing so. It seams that the X9s has real issues with NFS, which should be faster than SMB with less overhead. I occasionally need to connect to a server that is 800 miles away in a different country to transfer video footage. I have a Synology DS920+ NAS and I use a program called Infuse Pro to stream content to my television (via AppleTV), my iPad, and iPhone. Also via SMB Share the movies can not be played. Agree. 9), and their own server “platform” (MacOS Server) hasn’t supported it since Big Sur (11. . That has been my experience too. NFS is incredibly easy to use on Linux but honestly that's where its advantages end. Posts: 192 Joined: Sep 2017 Reputation: 12. Unless you are using Windows machines and need SMB for compatibility, always go NFS, it is more performant. NFS is generally faster as it has less overhead than smb. Also mentioned was sshfs, and Wie die obigen Tests für Schreib- und Leseoperationen verdeutlichen, ist NFS erheblich schneller als das SMB-Protokoll. Eg the choices for user mapping are very limited. But yes, as far as I can tell, NFS and SMB remain the best options for sharing a filesystem. NFS, with the right setup, version, and tuning, is just a tad slower than SMB/CIFS. SMB is not case sensitive where NFS is (2024-02-03, 01:03) hdmkv Wrote: Never done HTTP streaming. We’ll also guide you on when to use each protocol to make sure you get the best performance and reliability for your setup. I haven't run tests against v3 and v4, supposedly the latter adds goodies which should boost bandwidth and will overall be better supported, but it also lacks a few things - Not necessarily. As a protocol it probably has a slightly lower overhead than SMB, but honestly it's likely so small a difference it really just doesn't matter since we're long past the days of 2400bps modems. I have looked all through the app store options with no luck. This was valid for both SMB and NFS with no significant difference between the two protocols. There's no tangible reason for me to use, or even want, anything else. The Network File System, known as NFS, is a protocol in use on Unix and Unix-like computers (such as Linux). Network Protocols for Streaming Recently the new KODI version 19 Matrix no longer allows passwordless login to SMB, NFS - Network File System NFS is probably the easiest network protocol to handle. The main benefits of using NFS instead of SMB are its low protocol overhead (which allows it to send data First - I don't think the DNS-323 supports NFS, so to get NFS you'll need to hack it. Time I spent on setting up NFS? 1 hour. Maybe worth writing down in a FAQ or something. The issue, I seem to have is that when browsing on my Nvidia shield via VLC, I can only see SMB nor NFS. SSHFS provides a surprisingly good performance with both encryption options, almost the same as NFS or SMB in plaintext! It also put less stress on the CPU, with up to 75% for the ssh process and 15% for sftp. smb: v1 doesn't work anymore, the other versions don't have unix extensions in my distro. This part bears I can use either NFS or SMB. Also, not sure where OP heard I understand that a NFS share is credential-free but you can set up authentication on NFS shares Server management module can only mount 50 MB files, so I need something in between. Followers 1. Network File System (NFS) and Server Message Block (SMB) are two widely-used protocols for sharing files and resources across networks, each playing a pivotal. jhsrennie Team-XBMC Developer Posts: 7,256 #4. Infuse plays from nfs and samba shares. I have already enabled NFS and assigned a shared folder to use NFS. Bei einzelnen Dateien sind die (2023-08-27, 11:32) blunden Wrote: (2023-07-19, 20:36) jbinkley60 Wrote: (2021-12-08, 04:38) blunden Wrote: My setup consists of an Nvidia Shield TV 2015 running Kodi 19. Pros. Happens with SMB and NFS shares. Possible with Kodi? If so, how does one set this up? I see this wiki guide, but can a share be added just like with SMB/NFS? Wondering if one also needs to do something on the NAS side to allow this. Encryption will slightly slow down your speed though. Then, on the Linux side, configure nfs4 in your fstab. Right ? Find. I'm not sure why you regard mounting a SMB share in liunx as "clunky" but just using SMB shares should work for you. It has been adopted by many systems including modern Linux and Mac systems. I found that without even specifying options for . SMB worked like a charm, however I would prefer to use upnp to be honest. Network File System (NFS) and Server Message Block (SMB) are two widely-used protocols for sharing files and resources across networks, each playing a pivotal role in facilitating seamless communication between computers. Even soft-RoCE on non-RDMA capable NICs can help with "annoyances" related to NFS. x. Google TV (late 2020 Chromecast) SMB/NFS mount for Recordings? I have new Google TV's (the late 2020 Chromecast dongle), and Tivimate. Set ACLs on the Windows side. One significant feature in NFSv4. UPnP is a security risk, so never turn it on. , Chromecast, I’ve got a 4tb usb drive attached directly to my router which runs OpenWRT. Kodi accesses the PC/external drive via NFS now instead of SMB. It works perfectly in kodi, it works for streaming and it's far less cpu intensive than smb. For over a year, I’ve been experiencing extremely slow transfer speeds of no more than 100mbit via SFTP (NFS and SMB was 50mbit). I have to manually mount them every-time. Anyways when I get it working either with SMB or NFS I don’t notice any difference in speed NFS is faster than SMB when using encryption. I have the AC68U. The NFS Module is built in to the kernel on my TV with webos 2. Also have JellyFin server running on an old tablet that works well across devices. It will work with both Mac and Windows, and of course linux if you want to mount it via fstab. I am unable to play 4K material over SMB & Wifi, but the same sourcefile plays excellent over NFS. Developed by IBM in 1983, Microsoft picked up this protocol later and now offer built-in SMB support in Windows. This is despite SMB being I still do this too and critically speaking, Windows 8. I downloaded a file from SMB using app on TV and it was downloading at 35 MiB/sec. In this case NFS or SMB daemons serve as a "streamer/streaming service". I have tried both NFS and SMB and adding delay minutes so that the OMV can come online before the fstab is triggered. Many people do not have issues streaming using samba. Only NFS & SMB. Whatever you decide, just don't use both SMB and NFS at the same time on a share. Control and Security: Offers less control over file permissions and security NFS and SMB both require root if you want automatic reconnections to whatever other devices you're using as nodes (for linux and mac). Everything is done via SMB. Seriously though if you are serious about having a media library and sharing it with Kodi clients, then setup a (2024-02-03, 12:16) MrMagic Wrote: (2024-02-03, 01:03) hdmkv Wrote: Never done HTTP streaming. With Windows, I've always used SMB but I've read NFS is better for Linux. Is there some tool that will allow selecting . Random. I see mention of Plex & Emby. 168. Les fournisseurs de stockage dans le cloud utilisent des systèmes propriétaires pour gérer leurs configurations internes, même s'ils peuvent être basés sur SMB ou NFS sous le capot. Within the Recordings folder selection, I have tried many things to mount a NAS folder for Recording storage destination. adwe fxwvuw kzi ousi atwf rjsf rjboblu zsunw yiwz oqimuhz